« What a beautiful morning! | Early morning phone call » |
7 comments
Diana,
That’s just too good. If not for the fact that it’s your byline on a Navy Web site, I’d suspect you were making this stuff up. (Although I know some training material comes from real-world events, like the mythical warning sign in the undergrad optics lab at MIT: “Do not look into laser with remaining eye.")
Count the udders. Thanks - I’ll remember that.
So are you done with SOS? Or do you have to do a briefing on The Iliad tomorrow?
Dave
Me make things up? Nah. This is my weird little claim to fame.
“Remaining eye.” Heh. Good one. Yes…there’s a sign on the Royal Gorge bridge that says “No fishing from bridge.” You just know some pinhead actually tried it.
I’m essentially done with SOS. We grad tomorrow morning. The Sri Lankan brief was the last graded event, and I did that Monday.
The Iliad is for one of my fall semester courses at AUM (which began Monday, as fate would have it). No rest for the weary.
d
Diana,
So what -is- our business in Sri Lanka? I saw a bit on the History Channel recently that the British established rubber plantations there to break Brazil’s corner on the latex market, since rubber was fast becoming a strategic resource.
(I just thought it was an interesting coincidence, since you’d mentioned the briefing.)
Dave
In short, as far as I could figure with three days of desperate research to compile my paper/briefing, we’re supportive of the Sri Lankan government in its ongoing efforts to suppress the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelan (the world’s most prolific terrorist organization, incidentally), because our National Security Strategy (http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss.html…quite the eloquent document, incidentally) states two of our objectives as “working with others to defuse regional conflicts,” and “strengthen alliances to defeat global terrorism and prevent attacks against us and our friends.” We’re morally bound to help.
That’s what I briefed, anyhow.
I suppose you’re asking me what I think, though? ;)
I think Sri Lanka, though small, is in a strategically-important spot, readily accessible to the Middle East (where we have, ahem, ongoing business) and India itself, which is working to establish itself as a global power. We want as many friends in the area as we can possibly get while we try to encourage India to stand down its efforts to develop The Bomb.
I’m sure people complained about our bothering to making friends with tiny Qatar at one time, too. It has turned out to be indispensible in our “War on Terror.”
Oh…I’ve noted with interest that The Powers That Be have begun to admit, finally, that it isn’t possible to wage war on “terror” (duh), and that we’re waging war on Fundamental Extremists (most specifically *cough*, Islam fundamental extremists). It’s a step toward honesty.
Sri Lanka, incidentally, is roughly 74% Buddhist and 18% Hindu. There aren’t many Christians or Muslims there. Sri Lanka’s insignificant Muslim population may make them a more dependable ally–should we manage to win them over and help them overcome that pesky “Tiger” problem–than Qatar, even. If you ask me (and you did), our national interest in allying with Sri Lanka rose considerably 9/11/01.
Aside: did you know that our word “serendipity” came from the early Arab word for Sri Lanka (Serendip)? ‘Tis the pearl of the orient, you know. Absolutely breathtaking in its beauty…in non-tsunami- or LTTE-ravaged years. But then, every location has its drawbacks, doesn’t it?
d
Diana,
I knew Sri Lanka is something of an island paradise and that it’s in a good location strategically. I just wondered if there were other reasons we were interested in it.
Doesn’t India already have atomic weapons capability? I thought they and Pakistan demonstrated such within a few years of each other, causing a lot of sleepless nights for a lot of people.
War against “fundamental extremists.” Does that make Pat Robertson a member of the Axis of Evil? (Grin)
Dave
I thought India didn’t have nuke capability yet. Here’s a site about it. Apparently, they have done test runs but reports of their success are mixed. The DoD makes it sound as though they don’t have assembled “fully deployed” WMD, but India’s doctrine suggests they do–you can’t retaliate to a nuclear strike with an unbuilt weapon, I’m thinking.
And uh, it goes without saying that our war against fundamental extremists excludes the Christian type. Silly man. ;)
d
Hey, congratulations on getting published. That’s cool! :)
\nGotta love safety briefings!!!! LOL