« Random thoughtsPlans »

8 comments

Comment from: blingholio
blingholio

*gasp*

….now that I’ve clawed my way off the floor and back onto the chair, and am laughing slightly less raucously than I was a minute ago, I’d just like to thank you for putting all this in perspective. If we couldn’t make fun of the way things work here, I think we might start sawing our limbs off with plastic knives from the DFAC, singing gleefully all the while.

Next month, if they try to put me in for CGO of the month, I’m formally writing myself an LOR.

09/20/04 @ 21:55
Comment from: James
James

“..where the structure is based more on a cobweb than a tree, and the mission seems to have something to do with entering your hours in a cryptic and glitchy automated system.”

Ahh, this brings back fond memories of the Navy NALCOMIS aircraft maintenance tracking system.

QA didn’t care if you did it right, only if you logged it right. The aircraft could blow up and take out a nursery school, but you were alright as long as you logged your hours and parts.

09/20/04 @ 22:45
Comment from: Rick Hayslip
Rick Hayslip

“No good deed goes unpunished”
Take care LT.

09/20/04 @ 23:45
Comment from: David
David

Diana,

I forwarded your blog entry to Karen to assist her in writing your OPR :) This should give her plenty of ammunition and some additional bullet points of all the wonderful things you are doing for the USAF in Balad. Just think, when you get back maybe you’ll get nominated for CGO of the Quarter and you will have the priviledge of going through this process again. Yeaaaaa…

daveg

09/21/04 @ 01:40
Comment from:

Can I just run bamboo slivers under my fingernails instead?

d

09/21/04 @ 07:31
Comment from: blingholio
blingholio

Yeah, go with the bamboo slivers. Here’s your bullet:

“Through painstaking effort, supervised the placement of intrusion detection devices in 10 communications nodes”

09/21/04 @ 12:05
Comment from: Ric aka Shake
Ric aka Shake

Ha ha! Leave it to you to point out the obvious contradiction between the 1st Core Value and writing performance reports/award nominations. I got to write more than a few EPRs, as an NCO, I basically wrote my own, too. They of course, would get “massaged” in the manner of which you wrote. Don’t forget not to use the same verb twice … this is a big no-no, IIRC.

I don’t know about the OPR system, but if it’s as inflated as the EPR system, they’ve got some serious problems. EPRs are graded 1-5, with 5 being the best. This was whittled down from the previous 9-point system; a move I still don’t understand. You’d think more levels would allow more accurate representations of troops’ performance. Writing a 5 is easy, doing a 4 is much worse, ‘cause you get crap from your superiors about why this guy/gal doesn’t deserve a 5. To me, someone who just came in, did their job and little else, even without getting into trouble didn’t really deserve the highest mark. I butted a few heads and probably pissed off at least one subordinate. Oh well.

Getting awards should be a good thing. (Un)fortunately, my not meeting weight standards apparently negated me from doing a good job, so I didn’t get put in for many awards. Whatever. It’s all politics, as I’m sure you’re well aware.

09/22/04 @ 18:55
Comment from: JP
JP

And I just sent KT a bullet for your OPR. Should have read these first - much more interesting.
Take care & Keep your tail down.

09/23/04 @ 06:25