« It's a good lifeOn the inherent dangers of intolerance »

3 comments

Comment from: Hinermad
Hinermad

Diana,

Sounds like you’ve hit the ground running. Yes, when a college student compares you to someone who gets paid to be snide, sarcastic, and irreverent, you are being complimented. What other heroes would disaffected youth have?

Ah, the arguments I’ve had over passive voice. My tech writing teacher in college said it was evil and I believed her, to the point of becoming an evangelist for active voice.

Then I went to work for a company that dealt heavily with both military and civilian aerospace vendors. The first time my boss reviewed a test report I wrote he bled all over it with a red pen. Almost every change he wanted converted a sentence to passivity. I pushed back; I asked him what we were trying to hide. He started with the “we’ve always done it that way…” argument (which usually means “I don’t have a good reason") and I countered with “my teacher said…” and a little bit of “but I’ve always done it way and nobody else complained.” I don’t think I convinced him but he left me alone after that.

Good luck improving your charges’ grammar. They’ve had many years of American public schooling (in most cases) to develop such habits; you have a semester to change them. Time is not on your side. Still, if anyone can start them down the road to written adequacy, you can.

Dave

08/19/06 @ 07:46
Comment from:

A few funnies from my journal entries (names omitted to protect the oblivious):

After half an hour Jeremy finally regained conscientiousness.

I stood motionless like a pelican on one leg.

The sky became pitch black, distinguished only by several luminous stars and the radiance of the full moon.

The sky was dark and stormy, all alone in my log cabin.

An old woman, Eleanor, always awake at night, let the dog into her house to cook biscuits and gravy.

We talked about all the great memories, all the stupid boys, and all the crazy nights we shared.

The dark and snowy Chicago night expressed a foreboding occurrence in the near future.

When thinking about the quote, the magnitude of what the implications were of words was a lot to handle.

One of the principles was honesty, which I disagree with.

In these modern times, society has an enormous problem with destroying the environment.

Essentially, by having the mindset that nothing is owed to anybody is being greedy.

The corruption and greed that result from this attitude would make the world an impossible place to live.

Over the last decades, America’s awareness of the surrounding environment in which we live has grown.

Another example of words starting world changing movements is Dr. Martin Luther King’s “I have a dream” speech started a movement that is still in motion today.

Nothing like this has been done in the past so if it works we will be able to save history for our descendants.

Without it, the future of our planet is a risk, near and distant.

Today’s use of America’s surroundings have changed since we first arrived on the continent.

Then scientific research found a way to analyze every situation of the environment.

The descendants of our generation will never see the extinct species of animals.

I found the topic of ethics as a very interesting topic to be talking about with ethics.

As a government I know the strict regulations that are put onto the output of pollutants.

These are random samples, selected as examples for Monday’s class. I just changed my entire approach, based on what I saw yesterday.

On the other hand, grading is endlessly amusing. We all share the really good lines with each other as we go. The amusement provides a break from our anguish and frustration.

d

08/19/06 @ 16:33
Hinermad

Diana,

It’s a little odd to see such, um, personalized sentence construction with such deep topics. My kids wrote in a similar style when they were trying to make a minimum word count, but never with words like “conscientiousness.”

Dad missed out on delights like these - he never taught English.

Dave

08/20/06 @ 10:48