« Historiography?Pet Peeve #2 »

10 comments

Comment from: Hinermad
Hinermad

Diana,

Being a landlord isn’t for everybody. I’ve know several people who tried it and said it sucked. But I’ve also known people who were successful at it. They tended to be businessmen and women who had a lot of other deals going. Micro-Trumps I guess you could call them. The people who didn’t like it had either inherited a property or got an extra house in a land deal and thought they could turn it into easy income.

I suppose the difference is in how much effort you’re willing to put into the business. Hiring a management company would surely help, but it’s still going to require some of your attention now and then. I don’t know how much, but you might want to try to find out.

I, personally, would sell the house and re-invest the profit in Colorado. I met a guy who did that a few years ago. He bought a house near San Francisco, sold it after the West Coast housing boom and nearly tripled his money, then moved back to South Carolina. He had to re-invest the money or else pay capital gains tax on it, so he bought this huge place in a gated community. (Forget not being able to see the house from the road - you can’t even see it from the end of the driveway!)

Is this purely a business decision, or is there anything else to tie you to the house so that you’d want to keep it?

Dave

01/16/06 @ 11:43
Comment from:

It’s purely a business decision, Dave.

d

01/16/06 @ 11:47
Comment from: Hinermad
Hinermad

Diana,

In that case I guess it’s a cost vs. benefit analysis: what do each of the options (sell vs. rent) cost you in terms of cash, time, and other valuables against what you get in return.

Renting means an ongoing expense but also some income. The question there is “how much?” I can’t answer that. Maybe a management company can.

I’m not an expert in finance or real estate, but if developers are building in your neighborhood it’s probably a desirable location. If your yard is as big as you say you might even be able to subdivide.

It must be nice to have these kind of choices to make. (Grin)

Dave

01/16/06 @ 15:35
Comment from:

At the very least, I’m pleased that I probably won’t lose money on the place, which makes me quite happy. At some point, someone will subdivide the place, I expect. I’m not sure it’ll be me, though. I’m afraid subdivision would mean this house would probably be torn down and replaced with something newer and more compact. I think that would be a pity.

I’ll have to get myself a management company and take it from there.

d

01/16/06 @ 16:25
Comment from: Jeff
Jeff

I’m with Dave, especially since you’re moving many states away. It’s one thing to try to rent a place nearby, and a whole other deal to rent it across the country. You do have a small in with the USAF, so you might be able to steer your rentals to otherwise trusted persons, but if you leave it to a company, it’ll be up to them to interpret the guidelines and weigh the tenant.

Plus they’re going to nip into your profits just by being there.

Take the %45,000 you’ll pocket from selling the house now that it’s appreciated, and put what you need to into a new place, smartly investing the rest.

If you want to get into landlording, take half of that and invest in a property to rent in CO after you move. You know there’s plenty of transitioning persons there filling four or so military installations…

01/16/06 @ 19:28
Comment from: Judy Thompson, EA
Judy Thompson, EA

Don’t forget the tax consequences. If you sell within 3 years of moving out, it’ll count as a sale of your primary residence and you won’t pay any taxes on the profit.
If you turn it into rental property and later sell it, all the profit will be taxable.

01/21/06 @ 17:42
Comment from:

That is an excellent point, Judy. Someone mentioned that to me at some point early on, but I tend to forget. That could turn out to be a very costly brainlock indeed.

I believe the cutoff is 2 years though–effective last year. I could be wrong, though.

d

01/23/06 @ 19:15
Comment from: Judy Thompson, EA
Judy Thompson, EA

In order to get the tax benefits, the house must have been your primary residence 2 out of the last five years. So, do the math. If you sell within 3 years of moving, you’ll meet that requirement.
The rules on this have changed over the last several years. Also, it’s no longer necessary to reinvest the entire sale price, but it sounds like that won’t be a problem for you.

01/24/06 @ 22:37
Comment from: Roger
Roger

Never Never Never rent out a property farther than 2 miles from your residence. Trust me, I had a few. Sell it, take the profit, and run. Don’t be in a hurry to buy either. You may very well find a better deal once you live in Co for a while. (I think you have a year or 18 months to put the money back into a primary residence without the capital gains - but worth checking into). The other thing that comes to mind..The Academy may have a relocation assistance program that helps with interest / loan for downpayment if moving from a lower price real estate market. I know Kings Point did. (But then again, they were on the north shore of Long Island).

Good Luck

02/01/06 @ 02:17
Comment from: Judy Thompson, EA
Judy Thompson, EA

It’s not necessary to reinvest the profit. That rule has changed.

02/01/06 @ 22:06