« I'm hypovigilant | Catching up » |
12 comments
Diana,
Let me be the first to type, “WOOHOO! High five!” Major congratulations are in order. To not only get the job but to slam-dunk it on your interview is flaming impressive.
Don’t worry about the gaffe with Col Harrington. Your speech habits will change in the new environment. (Whenever I have a meeting with our South American distributor, I catch myself saying “si” for the rest of the day. It wears off.)
The question about the last book you’ve recommended is interesting. I’ll have to remember that. I occasionally get called on to interview candidates. It also makes me wonder what other books you’ve recommended to people over the years. I’m always looking for things to read. I’ll see if I can locate Guns, Germs, and Steel.
If you leave to work on your PhD, can you come back to finish out your committment at the Academy? And can you do multiple tours? (Assuming you’d want to, of course.)
Anyway… congratulations!
Dave
Good morning, Dave. :)
Yes…after the PhD, I return to the Academy to teach. Or, I can go forth into the world and write speeches for a general or something–which is better for getting more rank, probably–then I’d return to the Academy to teach. That’s why they want me to have the PhD, I reckon, so they can get their payback pound of flesh.
Guns is an excellent book and easy to find. It’s been out for a while, and you could probably find it in your local library. It won a PP, I think. I left my copy with a friend in Iraq, or I’d send it to you. The book offers a fascinating theory on why certain societies have taken over the world while others have remained primitive and/or conquered/oppressed. The book is very accessible, but thoroughly researched and supported. I think you’ll enjoy it, because you seem to dig a lot of the same things I do. (The book also, incidentally, lays social Darwinism to rest once and for all.)
I’m not worried about my grammatical error. :) I think it’s human. I also think the difference between me and I is dying a slow but sure death (just like the difference between who and whom). Living languages do that.
d
Diana,
That books definitely sounds like something I’d like to read. From the title it sounds like it’s about weapons development (which I’d also be interested in reading) but I’ve wondered why certain societies spread and conquered while others were content to remain stationary. Until they were conquered, anyway.
Not to cut short the flush of accomplishment, but what comes after the Academy? D’you think you’d be content to retire from there?
Dave
Congratulations, Cousin! I told Mother and Daddy (Bennett & Eva Jean - in case you don’t recognize my nickname) about your interview and they were excited for you as well and anxious to hear your results. I’ll be talking to them later today and I’ll share your good news. By the way, I had no doubts you’d succeed. We’re all very proud of you!
Congrats Diana!!! So happy for you. Incredibly exciting for you!!! I am very proud of you! Love to you…
Helen
Congratulations. cousin! Just reading everything you had to do the past months in addition to your work to achieve this goal has exhausted me. Don’t let anyone tell you you lucked into it; you EARNED it. hopefully soon you can slow down to a merely frenetic pace and catch a breath or two.
Love You,
HGB
hopefully soon you can slow down to a merely frenetic pace and catch a breath or two.
Hahahaha. Yes. Believe it or not, I’m looking forward to my thesis for precisely that reason. :)
Thanks, all.
d
I think there’s a large difference between the gaffs we make when we speak and the goofs we make when we write. It’s much more acceptable to slip in speech than in writing, since it’s difficult to edit. Don’t sweat it; as bright as they are, the cadets were very recently teenagers, and they generally have horrible grammar.
Congratulations, Diana.
I’ve been lurking since we met last summer at Lake Hypatia, but now I’m moved to ask:
How do you plan to deal with the official evangelicalism that we hear is rampant at the Academy?
Hi, Judy! Thanks! And nice to see you around. :)
I’m a bit confused concerning the the problems there, to be honest. The news reports I’ve read suggest the problem is with the chaplain corps at the Academy. This is the only place in the AF where the chaplains are apparently unclear concerning their rights and responsibilities (they are there to provide spiritual support for those who believe). However, I learned that some of the English positions were vacated through “encouraged” retirements as a result of the scandal. I have no clue what English instructors have to do with the religion of the cadets.
Anyhow…my plan is to stay out of it as much as possible. When possible, I’ll select various texts that provide enlightenment into the religious beliefs of others–literature is the best teacher of philosophy–in order to broaden their understanding of those who aren’t like them. I think most people are closed-minded about other religions (and lack of religion) due to being sheltered (and often being told lies about what those other people believe). There’s nothing like a good book to make you think and understand ideas you’d reject in non-exampled form. (I just made that word up :D.)
d
There have been several complaints of religious coercion by evangelical faculty and staff. Most recently Jewish graduate Mikey Weinstein sued the academy for violating his right to practice his religion. Investigations have been inconclusive, but I guess the encouraged retirement of some faculty members is a good sign.
Hi, Judy.
I’m still curious what the faculty have to do with it. I have no doubt I’ll be enlightened on this count once I get there, just to make sure I don’t make the same mistake they did.
I believe Mikey’s story hit the papers the day before I interviewed. If he’s who I think he is, his father–a retired AF officer and Academy grad–is ticked that the same things are going on, and decided to take a stand. It didn’t sound like a very strong case, from what I could glean of it at the time (and since then, I’ve been too busy to look into it).
d