<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/7.2.3-stable" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>the id, the ego, &#38; the single misfiring brain cell - Latest Comments on my favorite superhero</title>
		<link>https://pdblack.twistedpair.net/index.php?disp=comments</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://pdblack.twistedpair.net/index.php?tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=571" />
		<description></description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=7.2.3-stable"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<item>
			<title> Daddy [Visitor] in response to: my favorite superhero</title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 12:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><span class="user anonymous" rel="bubbletip_comment_85720">Daddy</span> <span class="bUser-anonymous-tag">[Visitor]</span></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c85720@https://pdblack.twistedpair.net/</guid>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;It might be an excellent exercise to take one of the Tarzan books, preferably #1, and re-write it without the racism, etc that you mention.  It might make a really *good* book then.  One thing that has caused me not to like them, especially, is that because of the stereotypes, the stories become predictable, and therefore, a little boring.  The same could be said of course for much of sf, which you know is my favorite fiction genre, lest it be poetry of virtually any kind.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might be an excellent exercise to take one of the Tarzan books, preferably #1, and re-write it without the racism, etc that you mention.  It might make a really *good* book then.  One thing that has caused me not to like them, especially, is that because of the stereotypes, the stories become predictable, and therefore, a little boring.  The same could be said of course for much of sf, which you know is my favorite fiction genre, lest it be poetry of virtually any kind.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<link>https://pdblack.twistedpair.net/index.php/2014/10/20/my-favorite-superhero#c85720</link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title> Aunt Bann [Visitor] in response to: my favorite superhero</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 23:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><span class="user anonymous" rel="bubbletip_comment_85693">Aunt Bann</span> <span class="bUser-anonymous-tag">[Visitor]</span></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c85693@https://pdblack.twistedpair.net/</guid>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;I haven&amp;#8217;t even THOUGHT about Tarzan for years, now. When I read him in the comics, I don&amp;#8217;t think I believed much of it. But you do have a good point, in the fact that most people (and I don&amp;#8217;t deny that I&amp;#8217;m probably one of them) want to believe that the hero/heroine is exactly what the writer has chosen to make him/her!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the idea. I&amp;#8217;ll have to think about it a little more.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t even THOUGHT about Tarzan for years, now. When I read him in the comics, I don&#8217;t think I believed much of it. But you do have a good point, in the fact that most people (and I don&#8217;t deny that I&#8217;m probably one of them) want to believe that the hero/heroine is exactly what the writer has chosen to make him/her!</p>

<p>Thanks for the idea. I&#8217;ll have to think about it a little more.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<link>https://pdblack.twistedpair.net/index.php/2014/10/20/my-favorite-superhero#c85693</link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title> Hinermad [Visitor] in response to: my favorite superhero</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 21:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><span class="user anonymous" rel="bubbletip_comment_85692">Hinermad</span> <span class="bUser-anonymous-tag">[Visitor]</span></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c85692@https://pdblack.twistedpair.net/</guid>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Diana,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A couple of years ago I went back and re-read an old science fiction series that I had read in my youth, and I was amazed at how much racism had crept into the story since I read it the first time. But rather than people of certain ancestries having noble or base abilities and morals, the heroes were all &amp;#8220;superior&amp;#8221; human beings developed through eugenics. And there was no argument from the common people; they all recognized their betters. (Unless they were working for the bad guys, in which case they did everything they could to undermine the trust placed in the Good Guys.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;ve heard the same complaint made against the Star Wars series. The most capable characters are all Jedis or of noble birth; everybody else is a stormtrooper who can&amp;#8217;t shoot or a civilian that gets shot anyway. Or Jar Jar Binks.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Makes me itch, it does. I don&amp;#8217;t mind larger than life heroes and villains, but someone who&amp;#8217;s the hero just because he&amp;#8217;s the right kind of person, not so much.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On a different note, I think you&amp;#8217;ve touched on the reason why bad writing can still be so successful. Some stories are so good that people want to hear them no matter how badly they&amp;#8217;re told. Dan Brown&amp;#8217;s novels appeal to latent conspiracy theorists, and there are a lot of them. Stephenie Meyer&amp;#8217;s work appeals to any number of relationship fantasies. Burroughs is in the same vein whether he&amp;#8217;s writing about Tarzan or John Carter. His heroes appeal to those of us who want to believe in someone who knows what he&amp;#8217;s doing, and has the guts to do it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Dave&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diana,</p>

<p>A couple of years ago I went back and re-read an old science fiction series that I had read in my youth, and I was amazed at how much racism had crept into the story since I read it the first time. But rather than people of certain ancestries having noble or base abilities and morals, the heroes were all &#8220;superior&#8221; human beings developed through eugenics. And there was no argument from the common people; they all recognized their betters. (Unless they were working for the bad guys, in which case they did everything they could to undermine the trust placed in the Good Guys.)</p>

<p>I&#8217;ve heard the same complaint made against the Star Wars series. The most capable characters are all Jedis or of noble birth; everybody else is a stormtrooper who can&#8217;t shoot or a civilian that gets shot anyway. Or Jar Jar Binks.</p>

<p>Makes me itch, it does. I don&#8217;t mind larger than life heroes and villains, but someone who&#8217;s the hero just because he&#8217;s the right kind of person, not so much.</p>

<p>On a different note, I think you&#8217;ve touched on the reason why bad writing can still be so successful. Some stories are so good that people want to hear them no matter how badly they&#8217;re told. Dan Brown&#8217;s novels appeal to latent conspiracy theorists, and there are a lot of them. Stephenie Meyer&#8217;s work appeals to any number of relationship fantasies. Burroughs is in the same vein whether he&#8217;s writing about Tarzan or John Carter. His heroes appeal to those of us who want to believe in someone who knows what he&#8217;s doing, and has the guts to do it.</p>

<p>Dave</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<link>https://pdblack.twistedpair.net/index.php/2014/10/20/my-favorite-superhero#c85692</link>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
