the id, the ego, & the single misfiring brain cell - Latest Comments on on the historicity of jesus https://pdblack.twistedpair.net/index.php?disp=comments en-US http://backend.userland.com/rss 60 ralph ellis [Visitor] in response to: on the historicity of jesus Sun, 03 Nov 2013 16:40:28 +0000 ralph ellis [Visitor] c35762@https://pdblack.twistedpair.net/ <p>I would not believe anything Richard Carrier says: he does not even know that Jesus is mentioned many times in the Talmud. But Jesus is mentioned as Yeshu the Nazarene in Sanhedrin 43, and called Balaam in many other locations. If Carrier does not even know this, then of what value are his other pronunciations?</p> <p>If you want to find the real historical Jesus - the person, not the demigod - the complete evidence for this is contained in the books ‘King Jesus’ and ‘Jesus, King of Edessa’. </p> <p>Jesus was a king of Edessa called King Izas-Manu (while Jesus was called King Jesus Em-Manu-El). And all the kings of Edessa wore a ceremonial Crown of Thorns.</p> I would not believe anything Richard Carrier says: he does not even know that Jesus is mentioned many times in the Talmud. But Jesus is mentioned as Yeshu the Nazarene in Sanhedrin 43, and called Balaam in many other locations. If Carrier does not even know this, then of what value are his other pronunciations?

If you want to find the real historical Jesus - the person, not the demigod - the complete evidence for this is contained in the books ‘King Jesus’ and ‘Jesus, King of Edessa’.

Jesus was a king of Edessa called King Izas-Manu (while Jesus was called King Jesus Em-Manu-El). And all the kings of Edessa wore a ceremonial Crown of Thorns.

]]> https://pdblack.twistedpair.net/index.php/2013/08/08/on-the-historicity-of-jesus#c35762